Please select a player from the suggestions
Please select a player from the suggestions

GW2 data · compared 2× this week · last compared 8 hours ago

Palestra

Defender

Palestra

Chelsea, CHE

Ødegaard

Midfielder

Ødegaard

Arsenal, ARS

🏆 Ødegaard wins 6 of 10 of data comparisons
5.5M
Cost
6.5M
0
Total Points
11
0.0
Points Per Game
11.0
2.8%
Selected By
10.3%
0
Goals Scored
1
0
Assists
0
0
Clean Sheets
1
0
Minutes Played
75
0.0
ICT Index
0.0
0.0
Form
11.0
💰 Ødegaard is the value pick - 1.69 pts per £m (Palestra 0.0 vs Ødegaard 1.69)
🎯 Palestra is your differential (2.8% owned) - Ødegaard is the template pick at 10.3%

Fixtures

Chelsea

  • BHA 2 (H) - 2026-08-30
  • ARS 5 (A) - 2026-09-06
  • HUL 2 (H) - 2026-09-12
  • BRE 3 (A) - 2026-09-18
  • BOU 3 (H) - 2026-10-10

Arsenal

  • AVL 4 (A) - 2026-08-31
  • CHE 4 (H) - 2026-09-06
  • SUN 3 (A) - 2026-09-12
  • BHA 3 (A) - 2026-09-19
  • LEE 2 (H) - 2026-10-10
📅 Palestra has the easier run over the next 5 (avg difficulty 3.0 vs 3.2)

FPL Advisor Recommendation

Palestra
17.5
VS
Ødegaard
62.4
High Confidence

Recommendation: Transfer in Ødegaard

Key Factors:

  • Better current form (11.0 vs 0.0)
  • Better value for money
  • More secure playing time

Ødegaard (Arsenal, £6.5m, 11 points) is the better FPL pick over Palestra (Chelsea, £5.5m, 0 points) as of Gameweek 2, and Palestra also has the easier next five fixtures (3.0 vs 3.2 average difficulty).

Who Would You Transfer In?

Cast your vote and see how other FPL managers voted this gameweek

🔥

FPL Managers Also Compared

🔥

👀 Players that other managers are comparing with these two!

⭐ Decided on your picks? Rate your full FPL team →