Please select a player from the suggestions
Please select a player from the suggestions

GW7 data · compared 7× this gameweek · last compared 3 hours ago

Palestra

Defender

Palestra

Chelsea, CHE

Ødegaard

Midfielder

Ødegaard

Arsenal, ARS

🏆 Ødegaard wins 7 of 10 of data comparisons
5.3M
Cost
6.8M
1
Total Points
30
1.0
Points Per Game
5.0
0.6%
Selected By
19.7%
0
Goals Scored
2
0
Assists
0
0
Clean Sheets
3
18
Minutes Played
466
0.0
ICT Index
43.5
0.5
Form
1.5
💰 Ødegaard is the value pick - 4.41 pts per £m (Palestra 0.19 vs Ødegaard 4.41)
🎯 Palestra is your differential (0.6% owned) - Ødegaard is the template pick at 19.7%

Fixtures

Chelsea

  • EVE 3 (A) - 2026-10-17
  • TOT 2 (H) - 2026-10-24
  • MUN 4 (H) - 2026-10-31
  • SUN 3 (A) - 2026-11-08
  • LEE 3 (H) - 2026-11-21

Arsenal

  • NFO 3 (A) - 2026-10-18
  • EVE 3 (H) - 2026-10-24
  • LIV 4 (A) - 2026-11-01
  • HUL 2 (H) - 2026-11-07
  • NEW 3 (A) - 2026-11-21
📅 Even fixture run for both - avg difficulty 3.0 over the next 5

FPL Advisor Recommendation

Palestra
22.1
VS
Ødegaard
41.4
High Confidence

Recommendation: Transfer in Ødegaard

Key Factors:

  • Better current form (1.5 vs 0.5)
  • Better value for money
  • More secure playing time

Ødegaard (Arsenal, £6.8m, 30 points) is the better FPL pick over Palestra (Chelsea, £5.3m, 1 points) as of Gameweek 7.

Who Would You Transfer In?

Cast your vote and see how other FPL managers voted this gameweek

🔥

FPL Managers Also Compared

🔥

👀 Players that other managers are comparing with these two!

Ødegaard
VS
Rogers
59 compared
Szoboszlai
VS
Ødegaard
26 compared
Mbeumo
VS
Ødegaard
29 compared
Saka
VS
Ødegaard
31 compared
Tzolis
VS
Ødegaard
24 compared
Ødegaard
VS
Groß
21 compared

⭐ Decided on your picks? Rate your full FPL team →