Please select a player from the suggestions
Please select a player from the suggestions

GW9 data · compared 1× this gameweek · last compared 12 hours ago

Mateta

Forward

Mateta

Crystal Palace, CRY

Muniz

Forward

Muniz

Fulham, FUL

🏆 Muniz wins 5 of 10 of data comparisons
6.3M
Cost
5.3M
3
Total Points
5
1.5
Points Per Game
0.8
1.2%
Selected By
0.4%
0
Goals Scored
0
0
Assists
0
0
Clean Sheets
0
91
Minutes Played
68
3.4
ICT Index
7.2
0.3
Form
0.7
💰 Muniz is the value pick - 0.94 pts per £m (Mateta 0.48 vs Muniz 0.94)
🎯 Muniz is your differential (0.4% owned) - Mateta is the template pick at 1.2%

Fixtures

Crystal Palace

  • TOT 3 (A) - 2026-10-31
  • LIV 4 (H) - 2026-11-08
  • COV 2 (A) - 2026-11-21
  • HUL 2 (H) - 2026-11-29
  • CHE 4 (A) - 2026-12-02

Fulham

  • AVL 3 (A) - 2026-10-31
  • NEW 3 (H) - 2026-11-07
  • MCI 5 (A) - 2026-11-21
  • BOU 3 (H) - 2026-11-29
  • TOT 3 (A) - 2026-12-03
📅 Mateta has the easier run over the next 5 (avg difficulty 3.0 vs 3.4)

FPL Advisor Recommendation

Mateta
22.3
VS
Muniz
20.5
Low Confidence

Recommendation: Transfer in Mateta

Key Factors:

  • More secure playing time
  • More favorable upcoming fixtures

Mateta (Crystal Palace, £6.3m, 3 points) is the better FPL pick over Muniz (Fulham, £5.3m, 5 points) as of Gameweek 9, and Mateta also has the easier next five fixtures (3.0 vs 3.4 average difficulty).

Who Would You Transfer In?

Cast your vote and see how other FPL managers voted this gameweek

🔥

FPL Managers Also Compared

🔥

👀 Players that other managers are comparing with these two!

⭐ Decided on your picks? Rate your full FPL team →