Please select a player from the suggestions
Please select a player from the suggestions

GW6 data · compared 605× this gameweek · last compared 1 day ago

Mateta

Forward

Mateta 🏥

Crystal Palace, CRY

Muniz

Forward

Muniz

Fulham, FUL

🏆 Muniz wins 5 of 10 of data comparisons
6.3M
Cost
5.4M
2
Total Points
3
2.0
Points Per Game
0.8
1.2%
Selected By
0.4%
0
Goals Scored
0
0
Assists
0
0
Clean Sheets
0
62
Minutes Played
38
2.5
ICT Index
7.0
0.0
Form
0.5
💰 Muniz is the value pick - 0.56 pts per £m (Mateta 0.32 vs Muniz 0.56)
🎯 Muniz is your differential (0.4% owned) - Mateta is the template pick at 1.2%

Fixtures

Crystal Palace

  • NFO 3 (H) - 2026-10-11
  • BHA 4 (A) - 2026-10-18
  • NEW 3 (H) - 2026-10-25
  • TOT 3 (A) - 2026-10-31
  • LIV 4 (H) - 2026-11-08

Fulham

  • IPS 2 (A) - 2026-10-10
  • HUL 2 (H) - 2026-10-17
  • COV 2 (A) - 2026-10-24
  • AVL 3 (A) - 2026-10-31
  • NEW 3 (H) - 2026-11-07
📅 Muniz has the easier run over the next 5 (avg difficulty 2.4 vs 3.4)

FPL Advisor Recommendation

Mateta
17.6
VS
Muniz
28.0
High Confidence

Recommendation: Transfer in Muniz

Key Factors:

  • Better current form (0.5 vs 0.0)
  • Better value for money
  • More favorable upcoming fixtures

Muniz (Fulham, £5.4m, 3 points) is the better FPL pick over Mateta (Crystal Palace, £6.3m, 2 points) as of Gameweek 6, and Muniz also has the easier next five fixtures (2.4 vs 3.4 average difficulty).

Who Would You Transfer In?

Cast your vote and see how other FPL managers voted this gameweek

🔥

FPL Managers Also Compared

🔥

👀 Players that other managers are comparing with these two!

⭐ Decided on your picks? Rate your full FPL team →