Please select a player from the suggestions
Please select a player from the suggestions
Mateta

Forward

Mateta

Crystal Palace, CRY

Strand Larsen

Forward

Strand Larsen

Crystal Palace, CRY

🏆 Mateta wins 4 of 10 of data comparisons
6.5M
Cost
6.0M
2
Total Points
1
2.0
Points Per Game
1.0
5.6%
Selected By
0.6%
0
Goals Scored
0
0
Assists
0
0
Clean Sheets
0
62
Minutes Played
27
0.0
ICT Index
0.0
2.0
Form
1.0
💰 Mateta is the value pick - 0.31 pts per £m (Mateta 0.31 vs Strand Larsen 0.17)
🎯 Strand Larsen is your differential (0.6% owned) - Mateta is the template pick at 5.6%

Fixtures

Crystal Palace

  • MCI 4 (H) - 2026-08-28
  • FUL 3 (A) - 2026-09-05
  • IPS 2 (H) - 2026-09-12
  • LEE 3 (A) - 2026-09-19
  • NFO 3 (H) - 2026-10-11

Crystal Palace

  • MCI 4 (H) - 2026-08-28
  • FUL 3 (A) - 2026-09-05
  • IPS 2 (H) - 2026-09-12
  • LEE 3 (A) - 2026-09-19
  • NFO 3 (H) - 2026-10-11
📅 Even fixture run for both - avg difficulty 3.0 over the next 5

FPL Advisor Recommendation

Mateta
32.4
VS
Strand Larsen
25.0
Medium Confidence

Recommendation: Transfer in Mateta

Key Factors:

  • Better current form (2.0 vs 1.0)
  • Better value for money
  • More secure playing time

Mateta (Crystal Palace, £6.5m, 2 points) is the better FPL pick over Strand Larsen (Crystal Palace, £6.0m, 1 points) as of Gameweek 2.

Who Would You Transfer In?

Cast your vote and see how other FPL managers voted this gameweek

🔥

FPL Managers Also Compared

🔥

👀 Players that other managers are comparing with these two!

Georginio
VS
Mateta
1 compared
Mateta
VS
McBurnie
1 compared
Mateta
VS
Isidor
1 compared

⭐ Decided on your picks? Rate your full FPL team →