Please select a player from the suggestions
Please select a player from the suggestions

GW8 data · compared 1× this gameweek · last compared 20 hours ago

Mateta

Forward

Mateta

Crystal Palace, CRY

Beto

Forward

Beto

Everton, EVE

🏆 Mateta wins 5 of 10 of data comparisons
6.3M
Cost
5.4M
3
Total Points
2
1.5
Points Per Game
1.0
1.2%
Selected By
0.5%
0
Goals Scored
0
0
Assists
0
0
Clean Sheets
0
91
Minutes Played
31
3.4
ICT Index
0.8
0.5
Form
0.0
💰 Mateta is the value pick - 0.48 pts per £m (Mateta 0.48 vs Beto 0.37)
🎯 Beto is your differential (0.5% owned) - Mateta is the template pick at 1.2%

Fixtures

Crystal Palace

  • NEW 3 (H) - 2026-10-25
  • TOT 3 (A) - 2026-10-31
  • LIV 4 (H) - 2026-11-08
  • COV 2 (A) - 2026-11-21
  • HUL 2 (H) - 2026-11-29

Everton

  • ARS 5 (A) - 2026-10-24
  • NEW 3 (A) - 2026-11-02
  • COV 2 (H) - 2026-11-06
  • BRE 3 (A) - 2026-11-23
  • LIV 4 (H) - 2026-11-29
📅 Mateta has the easier run over the next 5 (avg difficulty 2.8 vs 3.4)

FPL Advisor Recommendation

Mateta
25.4
VS
Beto
15.8
Medium Confidence

Recommendation: Transfer in Mateta

Key Factors:

  • Better current form (0.5 vs 0.0)
  • Better value for money
  • More secure playing time
  • More favorable upcoming fixtures

Mateta (Crystal Palace, £6.3m, 3 points) is the better FPL pick over Beto (Everton, £5.4m, 2 points) as of Gameweek 8, and Mateta also has the easier next five fixtures (2.8 vs 3.4 average difficulty).

Who Would You Transfer In?

Cast your vote and see how other FPL managers voted this gameweek

🔥

FPL Managers Also Compared

🔥

👀 Players that other managers are comparing with these two!

⭐ Decided on your picks? Rate your full FPL team →