Please select a player from the suggestions
Please select a player from the suggestions

GW9 data · last compared 11 hours ago

Mateta

Forward

Mateta

Crystal Palace, CRY

Marc Guiu

Forward

Marc Guiu

Chelsea, CHE

🏆 Mateta wins 5 of 10 of data comparisons
6.3M
Cost
5.0M
3
Total Points
0
1.5
Points Per Game
0.0
1.2%
Selected By
0.2%
0
Goals Scored
0
0
Assists
0
0
Clean Sheets
0
91
Minutes Played
0
3.4
ICT Index
0.0
0.3
Form
0.0
💰 Mateta is the value pick - 0.48 pts per £m (Mateta 0.48 vs Marc Guiu 0.0)
🎯 Marc Guiu is your differential (0.2% owned) - Mateta is the template pick at 1.2%

Fixtures

Crystal Palace

  • TOT 3 (A) - 2026-10-31
  • LIV 4 (H) - 2026-11-08
  • COV 2 (A) - 2026-11-21
  • HUL 2 (H) - 2026-11-29
  • CHE 4 (A) - 2026-12-02

Chelsea

  • MUN 4 (H) - 2026-10-31
  • SUN 3 (A) - 2026-11-08
  • LEE 3 (H) - 2026-11-21
  • NFO 3 (A) - 2026-11-27
  • CRY 2 (H) - 2026-12-02
📅 Even fixture run for both - avg difficulty 3.0 over the next 5

FPL Advisor Recommendation

Mateta
22.3
VS
Marc Guiu
17.5
Low Confidence

Recommendation: Transfer in Mateta

Key Factors:

  • Better current form (0.3 vs 0.0)
  • More secure playing time

Mateta (Crystal Palace, £6.3m, 3 points) is the better FPL pick over Marc Guiu (Chelsea, £5.0m, 0 points) as of Gameweek 9.

Who Would You Transfer In?

Cast your vote and see how other FPL managers voted this gameweek

🔥

FPL Managers Also Compared

🔥

👀 Players that other managers are comparing with these two!

⭐ Decided on your picks? Rate your full FPL team →