Please select a player from the suggestions
Please select a player from the suggestions

GW7 data · compared 13× this gameweek · last compared 1 minute ago

Mateta

Forward

Mateta 🏥

Crystal Palace, CRY

McBurnie

Forward

McBurnie

Hull City, HUL

🏆 McBurnie wins 8 of 10 of data comparisons
6.3M
Cost
5.5M
2
Total Points
14
2.0
Points Per Game
2.3
1.2%
Selected By
1.8%
0
Goals Scored
0
0
Assists
2
0
Clean Sheets
3
62
Minutes Played
531
2.5
ICT Index
25.3
0.0
Form
1.0
💰 McBurnie is the value pick - 2.55 pts per £m (Mateta 0.32 vs McBurnie 2.55)
🎯 Mateta is your differential (1.2% owned) - McBurnie is the template pick at 1.8%

Fixtures

Crystal Palace

  • BHA 4 (A) - 2026-10-18
  • NEW 3 (H) - 2026-10-25
  • TOT 3 (A) - 2026-10-31
  • LIV 4 (H) - 2026-11-08
  • COV 2 (A) - 2026-11-21

Hull City

  • FUL 3 (A) - 2026-10-17
  • BRE 3 (H) - 2026-10-25
  • IPS 2 (H) - 2026-10-31
  • ARS 5 (A) - 2026-11-07
  • BHA 3 (H) - 2026-11-22
📅 Even fixture run for both - avg difficulty 3.2 over the next 5

FPL Advisor Recommendation

Mateta
19.4
VS
McBurnie
31.1
High Confidence

Recommendation: Transfer in McBurnie

Key Factors:

  • Better current form (1.0 vs 0.0)
  • Better value for money
  • More secure playing time

McBurnie (Hull City, £5.5m, 14 points) is the better FPL pick over Mateta (Crystal Palace, £6.3m, 2 points) as of Gameweek 7.

Who Would You Transfer In?

Cast your vote and see how other FPL managers voted this gameweek

🔥

FPL Managers Also Compared

🔥

👀 Players that other managers are comparing with these two!

Mateta
VS
Delap
18 compared
Calvert-Lewin
VS
McBurnie
17 compared
Madjo
VS
Mateta
7 compared
Ferguson
VS
Mateta
11 compared
Brobbey
VS
McBurnie
8 compared
Calvert-Lewin
VS
Mateta
9 compared

⭐ Decided on your picks? Rate your full FPL team →