Please select a player from the suggestions
Please select a player from the suggestions

GW2 data · compared 1× this week · last compared 13 hours ago

Mateta

Forward

Mateta

Crystal Palace, CRY

McBurnie

Forward

McBurnie

Hull City, HUL

🏆 McBurnie wins 8 of 10 of data comparisons
6.5M
Cost
5.5M
2
Total Points
5
2.0
Points Per Game
5.0
5.6%
Selected By
1.7%
0
Goals Scored
0
0
Assists
1
0
Clean Sheets
1
62
Minutes Played
90
0.0
ICT Index
0.0
2.0
Form
5.0
💰 McBurnie is the value pick - 0.91 pts per £m (Mateta 0.31 vs McBurnie 0.91)
🎯 McBurnie is your differential (1.7% owned) - Mateta is the template pick at 5.6%

Fixtures

Crystal Palace

  • MCI 4 (H) - 2026-08-28
  • FUL 3 (A) - 2026-09-05
  • IPS 2 (H) - 2026-09-12
  • LEE 3 (A) - 2026-09-19
  • NFO 3 (H) - 2026-10-11

Hull City

  • COV 2 (A) - 2026-08-29
  • AVL 3 (H) - 2026-09-05
  • CHE 4 (A) - 2026-09-12
  • NEW 3 (A) - 2026-09-19
  • EVE 3 (H) - 2026-10-11
📅 Even fixture run for both - avg difficulty 3.0 over the next 5

FPL Advisor Recommendation

Mateta
32.4
VS
McBurnie
54.8
High Confidence

Recommendation: Transfer in McBurnie

Key Factors:

  • Better current form (5.0 vs 2.0)
  • Better value for money
  • More secure playing time

McBurnie (Hull City, £5.5m, 5 points) is the better FPL pick over Mateta (Crystal Palace, £6.5m, 2 points) as of Gameweek 2.

Who Would You Transfer In?

Cast your vote and see how other FPL managers voted this gameweek

🔥

FPL Managers Also Compared

🔥

👀 Players that other managers are comparing with these two!

Georginio
VS
Mateta
3 compared
Brobbey
VS
McBurnie
2 compared
Kusi-Asare
VS
McBurnie
2 compared
Thomas-Asante
VS
Mateta
1 compared
Madjo
VS
Mateta
1 compared
Wilson
VS
Mateta
1 compared

⭐ Decided on your picks? Rate your full FPL team →