Please select a player from the suggestions
Please select a player from the suggestions

GW7 data · compared 17× this gameweek · last compared 48 minutes ago

Schade

Midfielder

Schade

Brentford, BRE

Timber

Midfielder

Timber

Crystal Palace, CRY

🏆 Schade wins 7 of 10 of data comparisons
6.2M
Cost
5.0M
40
Total Points
16
6.7
Points Per Game
4.0
15.0%
Selected By
0.0%
3
Goals Scored
0
2
Assists
1
2
Clean Sheets
1
498
Minutes Played
343
38.4
ICT Index
15.0
5.0
Form
5.0
💰 Schade is the value pick - 6.45 pts per £m (Schade 6.45 vs Timber 3.2)
🎯 Timber is your differential (0.0% owned) - Schade is the template pick at 15.0%

Fixtures

Brentford

  • LIV 4 (H) - 2026-10-17
  • HUL 2 (A) - 2026-10-25
  • NFO 3 (H) - 2026-10-31
  • BHA 4 (A) - 2026-11-08
  • EVE 3 (H) - 2026-11-23

Crystal Palace

  • BHA 4 (A) - 2026-10-18
  • NEW 3 (H) - 2026-10-25
  • TOT 3 (A) - 2026-10-31
  • LIV 4 (H) - 2026-11-08
  • COV 2 (A) - 2026-11-21
📅 Even fixture run for both - avg difficulty 3.2 over the next 5

FPL Advisor Recommendation

Schade
62.2
VS
Timber
55.0
Medium Confidence

Recommendation: Transfer in Schade

Key Factors:

  • More secure playing time

Other Considerations:

⚠️Schade: Shoulder injury - 75% chance of playing

Schade (Brentford, £6.2m, 40 points) is the better FPL pick over Timber (Crystal Palace, £5.0m, 16 points) as of Gameweek 7.

Who Would You Transfer In?

Cast your vote and see how other FPL managers voted this gameweek

🔥

FPL Managers Also Compared

🔥

👀 Players that other managers are comparing with these two!

Szoboszlai
VS
Schade
64 compared
Schade
VS
Dewsbury-Hall
61 compared
Schade
VS
Belloumi
90 compared
E.Le Fée
VS
Schade
18 compared
Groß
VS
Timber
41 compared
Rice
VS
Schade
14 compared

⭐ Decided on your picks? Rate your full FPL team →