Please select a player from the suggestions
Please select a player from the suggestions

GW7 data · compared 6× this gameweek · last compared 3 hours ago

Mateta

Forward

Mateta 🏥

Crystal Palace, CRY

Strand Larsen

Forward

Strand Larsen

Crystal Palace, CRY

🏆 Strand Larsen wins 10 of 10 of data comparisons
6.3M
Cost
6.0M
2
Total Points
19
2.0
Points Per Game
3.2
1.2%
Selected By
0.7%
0
Goals Scored
1
0
Assists
1
0
Clean Sheets
1
62
Minutes Played
380
2.5
ICT Index
22.4
0.0
Form
3.5
💰 Strand Larsen is the value pick - 3.17 pts per £m (Mateta 0.32 vs Strand Larsen 3.17)
🎯 Strand Larsen is your differential (0.7% owned) - Mateta is the template pick at 1.2%

Fixtures

Crystal Palace

  • BHA 4 (A) - 2026-10-18
  • NEW 3 (H) - 2026-10-25
  • TOT 3 (A) - 2026-10-31
  • LIV 4 (H) - 2026-11-08
  • COV 2 (A) - 2026-11-21

Crystal Palace

  • BHA 4 (A) - 2026-10-18
  • NEW 3 (H) - 2026-10-25
  • TOT 3 (A) - 2026-10-31
  • LIV 4 (H) - 2026-11-08
  • COV 2 (A) - 2026-11-21
📅 Even fixture run for both - avg difficulty 3.2 over the next 5

FPL Advisor Recommendation

Mateta
19.4
VS
Strand Larsen
45.7
High Confidence

Recommendation: Transfer in Strand Larsen

Key Factors:

  • Better current form (3.5 vs 0.0)
  • Better value for money
  • More secure playing time

Strand Larsen (Crystal Palace, £6.0m, 19 points) is the better FPL pick over Mateta (Crystal Palace, £6.3m, 2 points) as of Gameweek 7.

Who Would You Transfer In?

Cast your vote and see how other FPL managers voted this gameweek

🔥

FPL Managers Also Compared

🔥

👀 Players that other managers are comparing with these two!

⭐ Decided on your picks? Rate your full FPL team →