Please select a player from the suggestions
Please select a player from the suggestions

GW7 data · compared 3× this gameweek · last compared 11 hours ago

Hato

Defender

Hato

Chelsea, CHE

Woolfenden

Defender

Woolfenden 🏥

Coventry City, COV

🏆 Hato wins 5 of 10 of data comparisons
4.5M
Cost
3.9M
8
Total Points
0
2.0
Points Per Game
0.0
0.7%
Selected By
0.1%
0
Goals Scored
0
2
Assists
0
0
Clean Sheets
0
258
Minutes Played
0
14.0
ICT Index
0.0
0.0
Form
0.0
💰 Hato is the value pick - 1.78 pts per £m (Hato 1.78 vs Woolfenden 0.0)
🎯 Woolfenden is your differential (0.1% owned) - Hato is the template pick at 0.7%

Fixtures

Chelsea

  • EVE 3 (A) - 2026-10-17
  • TOT 2 (H) - 2026-10-24
  • MUN 4 (H) - 2026-10-31
  • SUN 3 (A) - 2026-11-08
  • LEE 3 (H) - 2026-11-21

Coventry City

  • TOT 3 (A) - 2026-10-19
  • FUL 2 (H) - 2026-10-24
  • SUN 3 (H) - 2026-10-31
  • EVE 3 (A) - 2026-11-06
  • CRY 2 (H) - 2026-11-21
📅 Woolfenden has the easier run over the next 5 (avg difficulty 2.6 vs 3.0)

FPL Advisor Recommendation

Hato
23.6
VS
Woolfenden
21.0
Low Confidence

Recommendation: Transfer in Hato

Key Factors:

  • More secure playing time

Hato (Chelsea, £4.5m, 8 points) is the better FPL pick over Woolfenden (Coventry City, £3.9m, 0 points) as of Gameweek 7, and Woolfenden also has the easier next five fixtures (2.6 vs 3.0 average difficulty).

Who Would You Transfer In?

Cast your vote and see how other FPL managers voted this gameweek

🔥

FPL Managers Also Compared

🔥

👀 Players that other managers are comparing with these two!

⭐ Decided on your picks? Rate your full FPL team →