Please select a player from the suggestions
Please select a player from the suggestions

GW2 data · compared 1× this week · last compared 53 minutes ago

Mateta

Forward

Mateta

Crystal Palace, CRY

Cherif

Forward

Cherif

Coventry City, COV

🏆 Mateta wins 4 of 10 of data comparisons
6.5M
Cost
5.0M
2
Total Points
0
2.0
Points Per Game
0.0
5.5%
Selected By
0.1%
0
Goals Scored
0
0
Assists
0
0
Clean Sheets
0
62
Minutes Played
0
0.0
ICT Index
0.0
2.0
Form
0.0
💰 Mateta is the value pick - 0.31 pts per £m (Mateta 0.31 vs Cherif 0.0)
🎯 Cherif is your differential (0.1% owned) - Mateta is the template pick at 5.5%

Fixtures

Crystal Palace

  • MCI 4 (H) - 2026-08-28
  • FUL 3 (A) - 2026-09-05
  • IPS 2 (H) - 2026-09-12
  • LEE 3 (A) - 2026-09-19
  • NFO 3 (H) - 2026-10-11

Coventry City

  • HUL 2 (H) - 2026-08-29
  • MCI 5 (A) - 2026-09-05
  • BHA 2 (H) - 2026-09-13
  • NFO 3 (A) - 2026-09-19
  • NEW 2 (H) - 2026-10-12
📅 Cherif has the easier run over the next 5 (avg difficulty 2.8 vs 3.0)

FPL Advisor Recommendation

Mateta
32.4
VS
Cherif
19.2
High Confidence

Recommendation: Transfer in Mateta

Key Factors:

  • Better current form (2.0 vs 0.0)
  • Better value for money
  • More secure playing time

Mateta (Crystal Palace, £6.5m, 2 points) is the better FPL pick over Cherif (Coventry City, £5.0m, 0 points) as of Gameweek 2, and Cherif also has the easier next five fixtures (2.8 vs 3.0 average difficulty).

Who Would You Transfer In?

Cast your vote and see how other FPL managers voted this gameweek

🔥

FPL Managers Also Compared

🔥

👀 Players that other managers are comparing with these two!

⭐ Decided on your picks? Rate your full FPL team →