Please select a player from the suggestions
Please select a player from the suggestions

GW7 data · compared 2× this gameweek · last compared 6 hours ago

McAtee

Midfielder

McAtee

Nott'm Forest, NFO

Schade

Midfielder

Schade

Brentford, BRE

🏆 Schade wins 6 of 10 of data comparisons
5.5M
Cost
6.2M
16
Total Points
40
2.7
Points Per Game
6.7
0.1%
Selected By
15.0%
0
Goals Scored
3
0
Assists
2
2
Clean Sheets
2
506
Minutes Played
498
32.4
ICT Index
38.4
3.0
Form
5.0
💰 Schade is the value pick - 6.45 pts per £m (McAtee 2.91 vs Schade 6.45)
🎯 McAtee is your differential (0.1% owned) - Schade is the template pick at 15.0%

Fixtures

Nott'm Forest

  • ARS 4 (H) - 2026-10-18
  • IPS 2 (A) - 2026-10-23
  • BRE 3 (A) - 2026-10-31
  • MCI 4 (H) - 2026-11-07
  • BOU 3 (A) - 2026-11-21

Brentford

  • LIV 4 (H) - 2026-10-17
  • HUL 2 (A) - 2026-10-25
  • NFO 3 (H) - 2026-10-31
  • BHA 4 (A) - 2026-11-08
  • EVE 3 (H) - 2026-11-23
📅 Even fixture run for both - avg difficulty 3.2 over the next 5

FPL Advisor Recommendation

McAtee
43.9
VS
Schade
62.2
High Confidence

Recommendation: Transfer in Schade

Key Factors:

  • Better current form (5.0 vs 3.0)
  • Better value for money

Other Considerations:

⚠️Schade: Shoulder injury - 75% chance of playing

Schade (Brentford, £6.2m, 40 points) is the better FPL pick over McAtee (Nott'm Forest, £5.5m, 16 points) as of Gameweek 7.

Who Would You Transfer In?

Cast your vote and see how other FPL managers voted this gameweek

🔥

FPL Managers Also Compared

🔥

👀 Players that other managers are comparing with these two!

⭐ Decided on your picks? Rate your full FPL team →