Please select a player from the suggestions
Please select a player from the suggestions

GW7 data · last compared 5 days ago

Hirst

Forward

Hirst

Ipswich Town, IPS

Mateta

Forward

Mateta 🏥

Crystal Palace, CRY

🏆 Mateta wins 4 of 10 of data comparisons
5.0M
Cost
6.3M
0
Total Points
2
0.0
Points Per Game
2.0
0.1%
Selected By
1.2%
0
Goals Scored
0
0
Assists
0
0
Clean Sheets
0
0
Minutes Played
62
0.0
ICT Index
2.5
0.0
Form
0.0
💰 Mateta is the value pick - 0.32 pts per £m (Hirst 0.0 vs Mateta 0.32)
🎯 Hirst is your differential (0.1% owned) - Mateta is the template pick at 1.2%

Fixtures

Ipswich Town

  • MCI 5 (A) - 2026-10-17
  • NFO 3 (H) - 2026-10-23
  • HUL 2 (A) - 2026-10-31
  • BOU 3 (H) - 2026-11-08
  • TOT 3 (A) - 2026-11-21

Crystal Palace

  • BHA 4 (A) - 2026-10-18
  • NEW 3 (H) - 2026-10-25
  • TOT 3 (A) - 2026-10-31
  • LIV 4 (H) - 2026-11-08
  • COV 2 (A) - 2026-11-21
📅 Even fixture run for both - avg difficulty 3.2 over the next 5

FPL Advisor Recommendation

Hirst
15.7
VS
Mateta
19.4
Low Confidence

Recommendation: Transfer in Mateta

Key Factors:

  • More secure playing time

Other Considerations:

⚠️Mateta: Hamstring injury - Expected back 18 Oct

Mateta (Crystal Palace, £6.3m, 2 points) is the better FPL pick over Hirst (Ipswich Town, £5.0m, 0 points) as of Gameweek 7.

Who Would You Transfer In?

Cast your vote and see how other FPL managers voted this gameweek

🔥

FPL Managers Also Compared

🔥

👀 Players that other managers are comparing with these two!

Mateta
VS
Delap
16 compared
Mateta
VS
McBurnie
9 compared
Madjo
VS
Mateta
4 compared
Ferguson
VS
Mateta
7 compared

⭐ Decided on your picks? Rate your full FPL team →