Please select a player from the suggestions
Please select a player from the suggestions

GW8 data · last compared 6 days ago

Hirst

Forward

Hirst

Ipswich Town, IPS

Mateta

Forward

Mateta

Crystal Palace, CRY

🏆 Mateta wins 5 of 10 of data comparisons
5.0M
Cost
6.3M
0
Total Points
3
0.0
Points Per Game
1.5
0.1%
Selected By
1.2%
0
Goals Scored
0
0
Assists
0
0
Clean Sheets
0
0
Minutes Played
91
0.0
ICT Index
3.4
0.0
Form
0.5
💰 Mateta is the value pick - 0.48 pts per £m (Hirst 0.0 vs Mateta 0.48)
🎯 Hirst is your differential (0.1% owned) - Mateta is the template pick at 1.2%

Fixtures

Ipswich Town

  • NFO 3 (H) - 2026-10-23
  • HUL 2 (A) - 2026-10-31
  • BOU 3 (H) - 2026-11-08
  • TOT 3 (A) - 2026-11-21
  • AVL 3 (H) - 2026-11-28

Crystal Palace

  • NEW 3 (H) - 2026-10-25
  • TOT 3 (A) - 2026-10-31
  • LIV 4 (H) - 2026-11-08
  • COV 2 (A) - 2026-11-21
  • HUL 2 (H) - 2026-11-29
📅 Even fixture run for both - avg difficulty 2.8 over the next 5

FPL Advisor Recommendation

Hirst
19.2
VS
Mateta
25.4
Medium Confidence

Recommendation: Transfer in Mateta

Key Factors:

  • Better current form (0.5 vs 0.0)
  • Better value for money
  • More secure playing time

Mateta (Crystal Palace, £6.3m, 3 points) is the better FPL pick over Hirst (Ipswich Town, £5.0m, 0 points) as of Gameweek 8.

Who Would You Transfer In?

Cast your vote and see how other FPL managers voted this gameweek

🔥

FPL Managers Also Compared

🔥

👀 Players that other managers are comparing with these two!

Mateta
VS
Delap
15 compared
Mateta
VS
McBurnie
12 compared
Kostoulas
VS
Mateta
8 compared
Ferguson
VS
Mateta
7 compared
Mateta
VS
Wissa
11 compared

⭐ Decided on your picks? Rate your full FPL team →