Please select a player from the suggestions
Please select a player from the suggestions

GW9 data · last compared 14 days ago

Welbeck

Forward

Welbeck

Chelsea, CHE

Hirst

Forward

Hirst

Ipswich Town, IPS

🏆 Welbeck wins 5 of 10 of data comparisons
5.8M
Cost
5.0M
6
Total Points
0
1.2
Points Per Game
0.0
0.7%
Selected By
0.1%
0
Goals Scored
0
0
Assists
0
0
Clean Sheets
0
93
Minutes Played
0
6.2
ICT Index
0.0
0.7
Form
0.0
💰 Welbeck is the value pick - 1.03 pts per £m (Welbeck 1.03 vs Hirst 0.0)
🎯 Hirst is your differential (0.1% owned) - Welbeck is the template pick at 0.7%

Fixtures

Chelsea

  • MUN 4 (H) - 2026-10-31
  • SUN 3 (A) - 2026-11-08
  • LEE 3 (H) - 2026-11-21
  • NFO 3 (A) - 2026-11-27
  • CRY 2 (H) - 2026-12-02

Ipswich Town

  • HUL 2 (A) - 2026-10-31
  • BOU 3 (H) - 2026-11-08
  • TOT 3 (A) - 2026-11-21
  • AVL 3 (H) - 2026-11-28
  • COV 2 (A) - 2026-12-01
📅 Hirst has the easier run over the next 5 (avg difficulty 2.6 vs 3.0)

FPL Advisor Recommendation

Welbeck
24.6
VS
Hirst
21.0
Low Confidence

Recommendation: Transfer in Welbeck

Key Factors:

  • Better current form (0.7 vs 0.0)
  • Better value for money
  • More secure playing time

Welbeck (Chelsea, £5.8m, 6 points) is the better FPL pick over Hirst (Ipswich Town, £5.0m, 0 points) as of Gameweek 9, and Hirst also has the easier next five fixtures (2.6 vs 3.0 average difficulty).

Who Would You Transfer In?

Cast your vote and see how other FPL managers voted this gameweek

🔥

FPL Managers Also Compared

🔥

👀 Players that other managers are comparing with these two!

⭐ Decided on your picks? Rate your full FPL team →