Please select a player from the suggestions
Please select a player from the suggestions

GW2 data · compared 4× this week · last compared 14 hours ago

Ballard

Defender

Ballard

Sunderland, SUN

Mitchell

Defender

Mitchell

Crystal Palace, CRY

🏆 Mitchell wins 4 of 10 of data comparisons
5.0M
Cost
4.5M
0
Total Points
1
0.0
Points Per Game
1.0
5.4%
Selected By
6.0%
0
Goals Scored
0
0
Assists
0
0
Clean Sheets
0
90
Minutes Played
90
0.0
ICT Index
0.0
0.0
Form
1.0
💰 Mitchell is the value pick - 0.22 pts per £m (Ballard 0.0 vs Mitchell 0.22)
🎯 Ballard is your differential (5.4% owned) - Mitchell is the template pick at 6.0%

Fixtures

Sunderland

  • FUL 2 (H) - 2026-08-30
  • BRE 3 (A) - 2026-09-05
  • ARS 4 (H) - 2026-09-12
  • MCI 5 (A) - 2026-09-19
  • BHA 2 (H) - 2026-10-10

Crystal Palace

  • MCI 4 (H) - 2026-08-28
  • FUL 3 (A) - 2026-09-05
  • IPS 2 (H) - 2026-09-12
  • LEE 3 (A) - 2026-09-19
  • NFO 3 (H) - 2026-10-11
📅 Mitchell has the easier run over the next 5 (avg difficulty 3.0 vs 3.2)

FPL Advisor Recommendation

Ballard
16.2
VS
Mitchell
25.4
Medium Confidence

Recommendation: Transfer in Mitchell

Key Factors:

  • Better current form (1.0 vs 0.0)
  • Better value for money
  • More favorable upcoming fixtures

Mitchell (Crystal Palace, £4.5m, 1 points) is the better FPL pick over Ballard (Sunderland, £5.0m, 0 points) as of Gameweek 2, and Mitchell also has the easier next five fixtures (3.0 vs 3.2 average difficulty).

Who Would You Transfer In?

Cast your vote and see how other FPL managers voted this gameweek

🔥

FPL Managers Also Compared

🔥

👀 Players that other managers are comparing with these two!

⭐ Decided on your picks? Rate your full FPL team →