Please select a player from the suggestions
Please select a player from the suggestions

GW7 data · compared 17× this gameweek · last compared 2 hours ago

Barcola

Midfielder

Barcola

Liverpool, LIV

Rogers

Midfielder

Rogers

Chelsea, CHE

🏆 Rogers wins 8 of 10 of data comparisons
8.0M
Cost
7.9M
9
Total Points
38
2.2
Points Per Game
6.3
2.1%
Selected By
45.1%
0
Goals Scored
4
0
Assists
1
2
Clean Sheets
0
255
Minutes Played
520
12.3
ICT Index
51.7
2.5
Form
5.5
💰 Rogers is the value pick - 4.81 pts per £m (Barcola 1.12 vs Rogers 4.81)
🎯 Barcola is your differential (2.1% owned) - Rogers is the template pick at 45.1%

Fixtures

Liverpool

  • BRE 3 (A) - 2026-10-17
  • BHA 3 (H) - 2026-10-25
  • ARS 4 (H) - 2026-11-01
  • CRY 3 (A) - 2026-11-08
  • MUN 4 (H) - 2026-11-22

Chelsea

  • EVE 3 (A) - 2026-10-17
  • TOT 2 (H) - 2026-10-24
  • MUN 4 (H) - 2026-10-31
  • SUN 3 (A) - 2026-11-08
  • LEE 3 (H) - 2026-11-21
📅 Rogers has the easier run over the next 5 (avg difficulty 3.0 vs 3.4)

FPL Advisor Recommendation

Barcola
34.4
VS
Rogers
64.8
High Confidence

Recommendation: Transfer in Rogers

Key Factors:

  • Better current form (5.5 vs 2.5)
  • Better value for money
  • More secure playing time
  • More favorable upcoming fixtures

Rogers (Chelsea, £7.9m, 38 points) is the better FPL pick over Barcola (Liverpool, £8.0m, 9 points) as of Gameweek 7, and Rogers also has the easier next five fixtures (3.0 vs 3.4 average difficulty).

Who Would You Transfer In?

Cast your vote and see how other FPL managers voted this gameweek

🔥

FPL Managers Also Compared

🔥

👀 Players that other managers are comparing with these two!

⭐ Decided on your picks? Rate your full FPL team →