Please select a player from the suggestions
Please select a player from the suggestions

GW7 data · compared 5× this gameweek · last compared 50 minutes ago

Kalimuendo

Forward

Kalimuendo

Nott'm Forest, NFO

Mateta

Forward

Mateta 🏥

Crystal Palace, CRY

5.4M
Cost
6.3M
2
Total Points
2
1.0
Points Per Game
2.0
0.0%
Selected By
1.2%
0
Goals Scored
0
0
Assists
0
0
Clean Sheets
0
8
Minutes Played
62
0.4
ICT Index
2.5
0.5
Form
0.0
💰 Kalimuendo is the value pick - 0.37 pts per £m (Kalimuendo 0.37 vs Mateta 0.32)
🎯 Kalimuendo is your differential (0.0% owned) - Mateta is the template pick at 1.2%

Fixtures

Nott'm Forest

  • ARS 4 (H) - 2026-10-18
  • IPS 2 (A) - 2026-10-23
  • BRE 3 (A) - 2026-10-31
  • MCI 4 (H) - 2026-11-07
  • BOU 3 (A) - 2026-11-21

Crystal Palace

  • BHA 4 (A) - 2026-10-18
  • NEW 3 (H) - 2026-10-25
  • TOT 3 (A) - 2026-10-31
  • LIV 4 (H) - 2026-11-08
  • COV 2 (A) - 2026-11-21
📅 Even fixture run for both - avg difficulty 3.2 over the next 5

FPL Advisor Recommendation

Kalimuendo
20.3
VS
Mateta
19.4
Low Confidence

Recommendation: Transfer in Kalimuendo

Key Factors:

  • Better current form (0.5 vs 0.0)
  • Better value for money

Kalimuendo (Nott'm Forest, £5.4m, 2 points) is the better FPL pick over Mateta (Crystal Palace, £6.3m, 2 points) as of Gameweek 7.

Who Would You Transfer In?

Cast your vote and see how other FPL managers voted this gameweek

🔥

FPL Managers Also Compared

🔥

👀 Players that other managers are comparing with these two!

Kalimuendo
VS
Wissa
48 compared
Mateta
VS
Delap
19 compared
Mateta
VS
McBurnie
14 compared
Madjo
VS
Mateta
8 compared
Ferguson
VS
Mateta
11 compared
Calvert-Lewin
VS
Mateta
12 compared

⭐ Decided on your picks? Rate your full FPL team →