Please select a player from the suggestions
Please select a player from the suggestions
Thomas-Asante

Forward

Thomas-Asante

Coventry City, COV

Mateta

Forward

Mateta

Crystal Palace, CRY

🏆 Thomas-Asante wins 3 of 10 of data comparisons
5.0M
Cost
6.5M
2
Total Points
2
2.0
Points Per Game
2.0
0.8%
Selected By
5.6%
0
Goals Scored
0
0
Assists
0
0
Clean Sheets
0
69
Minutes Played
62
0.0
ICT Index
0.0
2.0
Form
2.0
💰 Thomas-Asante is the value pick - 0.4 pts per £m (Thomas-Asante 0.4 vs Mateta 0.31)
🎯 Thomas-Asante is your differential (0.8% owned) - Mateta is the template pick at 5.6%

Fixtures

Coventry City

  • HUL 2 (H) - 2026-08-29
  • MCI 5 (A) - 2026-09-05
  • BHA 2 (H) - 2026-09-13
  • NFO 3 (A) - 2026-09-19
  • NEW 2 (H) - 2026-10-12

Crystal Palace

  • MCI 4 (H) - 2026-08-28
  • FUL 3 (A) - 2026-09-05
  • IPS 2 (H) - 2026-09-12
  • LEE 3 (A) - 2026-09-19
  • NFO 3 (H) - 2026-10-11
📅 Thomas-Asante has the easier run over the next 5 (avg difficulty 2.8 vs 3.0)

FPL Advisor Recommendation

Thomas-Asante
34.4
VS
Mateta
32.4
Low Confidence

Recommendation: Transfer in Thomas-Asante

Key Factors:

  • Better value for money
  • More secure playing time
  • More favorable upcoming fixtures

Thomas-Asante (Coventry City, £5.0m, 2 points) is the better FPL pick over Mateta (Crystal Palace, £6.5m, 2 points) as of Gameweek 2, and Thomas-Asante also has the easier next five fixtures (2.8 vs 3.0 average difficulty).

Who Would You Transfer In?

Cast your vote and see how other FPL managers voted this gameweek

🔥

FPL Managers Also Compared

🔥

👀 Players that other managers are comparing with these two!

⭐ Decided on your picks? Rate your full FPL team →