Please select a player from the suggestions
Please select a player from the suggestions
Simms

Forward

Simms

Coventry City, COV

Mateta

Forward

Mateta

Crystal Palace, CRY

🏆 Simms wins 3 of 10 of data comparisons
5.0M
Cost
6.5M
2
Total Points
2
2.0
Points Per Game
2.0
0.9%
Selected By
5.6%
0
Goals Scored
0
0
Assists
0
0
Clean Sheets
0
69
Minutes Played
62
0.0
ICT Index
0.0
2.0
Form
2.0
💰 Simms is the value pick - 0.4 pts per £m (Simms 0.4 vs Mateta 0.31)
🎯 Simms is your differential (0.9% owned) - Mateta is the template pick at 5.6%

Fixtures

Coventry City

  • HUL 2 (H) - 2026-08-29
  • MCI 5 (A) - 2026-09-05
  • BHA 2 (H) - 2026-09-13
  • NFO 3 (A) - 2026-09-19
  • NEW 2 (H) - 2026-10-12

Crystal Palace

  • MCI 4 (H) - 2026-08-28
  • FUL 3 (A) - 2026-09-05
  • IPS 2 (H) - 2026-09-12
  • LEE 3 (A) - 2026-09-19
  • NFO 3 (H) - 2026-10-11
📅 Simms has the easier run over the next 5 (avg difficulty 2.8 vs 3.0)

FPL Advisor Recommendation

Simms
34.4
VS
Mateta
32.4
Low Confidence

Recommendation: Transfer in Simms

Key Factors:

  • Better value for money
  • More secure playing time
  • More favorable upcoming fixtures

Simms (Coventry City, £5.0m, 2 points) is the better FPL pick over Mateta (Crystal Palace, £6.5m, 2 points) as of Gameweek 2, and Simms also has the easier next five fixtures (2.8 vs 3.0 average difficulty).

Who Would You Transfer In?

Cast your vote and see how other FPL managers voted this gameweek

🔥

FPL Managers Also Compared

🔥

👀 Players that other managers are comparing with these two!

⭐ Decided on your picks? Rate your full FPL team →