Please select a player from the suggestions
Please select a player from the suggestions
Al-Hamadi

Forward

Al-Hamadi

Ipswich Town, IPS

Mateta

Forward

Mateta

Crystal Palace, CRY

🏆 Mateta wins 4 of 10 of data comparisons
5.0M
Cost
6.5M
0
Total Points
2
0.0
Points Per Game
2.0
0.1%
Selected By
5.6%
0
Goals Scored
0
0
Assists
0
0
Clean Sheets
0
0
Minutes Played
62
0.0
ICT Index
0.0
0.0
Form
2.0
💰 Mateta is the value pick - 0.31 pts per £m (Al-Hamadi 0.0 vs Mateta 0.31)
🎯 Al-Hamadi is your differential (0.1% owned) - Mateta is the template pick at 5.6%

Fixtures

Ipswich Town

  • MUN 4 (A) - 2026-08-30
  • LIV 4 (H) - 2026-09-04
  • CRY 3 (A) - 2026-09-12
  • EVE 3 (A) - 2026-09-19
  • FUL 2 (H) - 2026-10-10

Crystal Palace

  • MCI 4 (H) - 2026-08-28
  • FUL 3 (A) - 2026-09-05
  • IPS 2 (H) - 2026-09-12
  • LEE 3 (A) - 2026-09-19
  • NFO 3 (H) - 2026-10-11
📅 Mateta has the easier run over the next 5 (avg difficulty 3.0 vs 3.2)

FPL Advisor Recommendation

Al-Hamadi
15.7
VS
Mateta
32.4
High Confidence

Recommendation: Transfer in Mateta

Key Factors:

  • Better current form (2.0 vs 0.0)
  • Better value for money
  • More secure playing time
  • More favorable upcoming fixtures

Mateta (Crystal Palace, £6.5m, 2 points) is the better FPL pick over Al-Hamadi (Ipswich Town, £5.0m, 0 points) as of Gameweek 2, and Mateta also has the easier next five fixtures (3.0 vs 3.2 average difficulty).

Who Would You Transfer In?

Cast your vote and see how other FPL managers voted this gameweek

🔥

FPL Managers Also Compared

🔥

👀 Players that other managers are comparing with these two!

⭐ Decided on your picks? Rate your full FPL team →